e Peavy, who did not earn a decision after leaving a 1-1 game in the sevennth inning. [url=http://www.authoritybroncosshop.com/c

TORONTO – “There’s a bunch of things that are ailing our hockey club. Tramaine Brock Jersey .” Randy Carlyle knew what was wrong with the Maple Leafs, but in a tenure that spanned 188 games and nearly three seasons, he could never do much to change it. He banged the drum loudly and repeatedly over a troubled tour in Toronto. It was about preaching, begging, coddling, kicking, doing whatever necessary to reach a group that ultimately remained, just that, out of his reach. The Leafs needed to have the puck more. The Leafs needed to play a “stiffer” defensive brand of hockey. The Leafs needed to stop relying unmercifully on their goaltenders, needed to stop relying on their powerful offence to win games. Carlyle knew all this. He said it often enough at the very least. “We need to find a way to get the most out of everybody,” said Carlyle in his old stomping grounds of Winnipeg, days before he was finally let go as Toronto’s head coach, the Leafs fourth since the second lockout. “That’s our job as a coaching staff. You don’t always have the luxury to say that you’d like this player or that player or this type of player. That’s not the way it works. You have an organization that provides you with players and our job, as we’ve said all along, is just to coach them up.” But be it because of a failed system, disconnected message, flawed personnel, or more likely, all of the above, Carlyle never got through to this group in Toronto. Dave Nonis, the Leafs general manager, said as much shortly after the firing was announced on Tuesday morning. “It’s been too much of a rollercoaster,” Nonis said in his typically stoic fashion, informing Carlyle of the decision late Monday evening. “It’s not that they’re not capable, because they are. It’s not that they haven’t done it, because they have. That’s probably the biggest reason or one of the biggest reasons for the change today.” There were times, Nonis said, that his group demonstrated what it was capable of accomplishing. He spoke as recently as this past summer and then again in training camp about the team’s success in the 48-game lockout shortened 2013 as reason to bring Carlyle back, if also firing three of his assistant coaches, oddly, in doing so. He said there were stretches again this season where the club showed itself capable, where it proved to be the “consistent team we were looking to be. But that’s not entirely true either. Even in winning times, this group showed itself as deeply flawed. They stormed through a month-long stretch with a 10-1-1 record, rarely achieving a product of quality. Rather, the Leafs scored in droves and then relied with increasing and alarming frequency on Jonathan Bernier. They’ve surrendered 40 shots or more in nearly a third of their games this season and sit just ahead of Buffalo in yielding 34.4 shots on average. They’ve been blown out more than every team but the Sabres, Oilers and Coyotes - nine times they’ve been beaten by three goals or more. In fact, the Leafs have played in more blowouts – both good and bad – than any team in the league. Twenty-two of their 40 games to date, alarmingly, have been decided by three goals or more. That’s a team that’s incapable of playing a style conducive to long-term success. His Leafs not only failed to keep the puck out of the net – despite often terrific goaltending – but failed to keep the puck at all with any consistency. They sit second to last in puck possession after finishing dead-last a year ago. Phil Kessel, Dion Phaneuf and James van Riemsdyk all notably saw their possession numbers plummet under Carlyle’s direction. van Riemsdyk, for one, held a 54 per-cent possession mark in his final season with the Flyers, tumbling to just 42 per cent this season. Beyond just the numbers was an often bizarre deployment and usage of players - a barely used, totally unproductive fourth line in recent seasons no better an example of that. This was a group – led by Carlyle – that was capable of very flawed highs and stunningly brutal lows. They ripped off wins at a blurring pace just before the Olympic break last year only to nosedive out of a playoff berth. They did the same again this year, winning 10 of 12 before losing seven of the next nine. There’s also evidence to suggest that repeated calls for improvement went unheard or if not unheard, then not absorbed by the group at large. Van Riemsdyk scoffed at the suggestion that wins early in the season weren’t always justified. “What’s a justified win?” he responded with apparent ire. Others in the room seemed to grasp something being off, that the formula undertaken in victory wasn’t necessarily best for long-term success, that repeatedly yielding 35-40 shots nightly wasn’t likely to bode well over the course of an 82-game season. Daniel Winnik called the firing a “wake-up call. It was the first time in his eight-year career that he’s had one of his head coaches fired. Winnik, though, felt Carlyle’s message was received. “[But] maybe at some points it wasn’t,” said Winnik. “There’s inconsistencies in our game, so maybe it was just inconsistent in guys receiving the message. That could be a part of it. I think when you’re as inconsistent as we’ve been it brings that to question.” “We were trying to do the right things,” added Cody Franson, “but for some reason we struggled to accomplish those details on a consistent basis. We share equal responsibility in that.” Nonis acknowledged the same during a meeting with players on Tuesday morning, informing them of the decision to fire Carlyle. But he also implicitly pinned much of the blame on the head coach. “It’s not that they can’t do it,” said Nonis of the roster, “it’s that our consistency hasn’t been there and it’s probably, not probably, it’s been trending downward for the last little while, where our consistency has actually been waning even more. You can chalk that up to players not listening if you’d like. But I don’t think it’s that they’re not capable, because they are. And that’s one of the reasons why we did this today.” These are not new troubles, though. These are the same failures of last season and even the late stages of a lockout year that ultimately ended in a long-awaited playoff berth. Failure to commit to defence, failure to possess the puck, failure to compete; long one of Carlyle’s repeated frustrations. All of which underscores the bizarreness and halfway measure of retaining Carlyle this past summer while firing three of his assistant coaches. “Randy deserved to come back,” Nonis said Tuesday, defending the decision, which saw Greg Cronin, Scott Gordon and Dave Farrish fired. “He had done enough to come back. We’d seen him do good things. We saw him do some good things this season. It’s not that he’s not capable. I think he’s a very capable coach. I think he’s an excellent coach. You don’t coach over 700 games without being good at it. Good coaches get let go and unfortunately today we had to do that.” But to suggest this solely being a coaching issue ignores the reality of what’s taken place in Toronto over the course of many seasons, not just a single 40-game stretch. In terms of the very big picture, these are issues that have lingered since the days of Ron Wilson and Brian Burke, issues also tied to a flawed core, one that’s signed up for the long haul no less. Kessel, van Riemsdyk, Dion Phaneuf, David Clarkson, Joffrey Lupul and Tyler Bozak are all locked up until at least 2018. And they’ve proven to be leaders of a team that’s hardly been good enough to qualify for the playoffs, let alone win a Cup. Carlyle asked the same things of Kessel that Wilson did a few years earlier, neither able to make more than a slight dent in a player whose negatives ultimately outweigh all the offensive positives. To think that will change under another head coach seems naive at this point. “You never change a leopard’s spots,” Wilson told TSN Radio in a rare interview on Tuesday. “I think you paint over some of those spots, but they’ll eventually shine through the paint and that’s just too bad.” Team president Brendan Shanahan will get a chance to see how Kessel and that core responds under new leadership – Peter Horachek and Steve Spott will lead the bench together for an unspecified amount of time – but it can’t be long before restructuring of that core takes place. There’s just too much evidence to suggest that it won’t work, at least for the ultimate prize of a Stanley Cup. This core has shown itself capable of fringe playoff status and barely even that. “And we know that,” Lupul said last week of the core’s lacking success, “whether it’s me or Bozie or Phil or Dion or Naz or Clarkie, we’ve got to be better and we’ve got to show ourselves and coaches and management that this team is growing and there’s been times we have and times we haven’t.” Franson – an impending free agent who may or may not be part of that core in the future – said more “accountability” was needed in the room. “We as a group have to hold ourselves more accountable for what’s been going on,” he said. “We know within our room that we’re as at fault as anybody else.” Dissecting and then resolving that core could prove far more challenging than the simpler task of firing the coach. “The coach is easy to let go,” said Nonis. “That’s the easy change to make.” Untangling a web ultimately created by Nonis is really the grander challenge Shanahan faces in remaking the Leafs. What to do with Kessel and Phaneuf, who are under contract to 2021 and beyond? Where to turn to with the likes of Bozak and Clarkson? What pieces of the roster are worth salvaging and which pieces are worth spinning off for the betterment of the future? And given the size and length of certain contracts, which players are even capable of being shipped off if that’s deemed the appropriate step? These are the tougher decisions Shanahan faces. His two biggest decisions to date as the leader of the Leafs have been to retain Carlyle and then fire him nearly seven months later. His next big choice, beyond the roster, is hiring a full-time replacement for the man he retained briefly and then fired. Players were surprised to learn that Carlyle was being brought back in the summer months while his lead assistant, Farrish, was being fired. They were taken aback again Tuesday morning when they learned of Carlyle’s fate. “You hear it from the media all before the season and stuff and in-season that Randy’s on the hot seat and then it finally happens and you’re like, ‘Crap’,” said Winnik. “And it’s not like we’re a bad hockey team or we’re at the bottom of the standings or anything, we’re right in the hunt of the playoffs, I think that’s where it’s surprising.” Courtland Sutton Broncos Jersey .com) - Marc Gasol and the Grizzlies withstood 18 Dallas 3-pointers, as Memphis took control in the third quarter and fended off a Mavericks rally en route to a 114-105 win in a Southwest Division showdown. Josey Jewell Broncos Jersey . Like a magic trick, the puck popped out behind Stalock in the San Jose net. While Sharks coach Todd McLellan decried the legality of the tiebreaking goal, the Los Angeles Kings celebrated their latest, greatest escape yet. http://www.authoritybroncosshop.com/royce-freeman-broncos-jersey-c-71/ . Charlottetown scored four times in the third period en route to a 5-2 win over the defending champion Halifax Mooseheads on Friday. BOSTON -- Instant replay, meet the Pesky Pole. David Ortiz hit a three-run homer high over Fenway Parks right-field foul pole on Wednesday, helping the Boston Red Sox rally for a 4-2 victory over the Texas Rangers. The fair call was confirmed by a replay review, according to Major League Baseballs replay Twitter account. "It was pretty close, but I knew it was fair," said Ortiz, who watched the ball sail into the seats before leaving the batters box. "I wanted to make sure it was fair. I wanted to keep watching it." The Rangers took a 2-1 lead in the top of the eighth and brought in Neal Cotts to face Ortiz with one out and two on in the bottom half. Ortiz, who had been 0 for 5 with five strikeouts against Cotts, lined a 1-1 fastball down the right-field line. Because the ball was much higher than the pole, which was named for former Red Sox shortstop Johnny Pesky, it was hard to tell where it crossed into foul territory. The pole is just 302 feet from home plate. "From our angle, its extremely difficult to tell," Red Sox manager John Farrell said. "We felt like it would be inconclusive at best with any type of replay that was available." Umpire Jerry Meals signalled a home run. Rangers manager Ron Washington waited until Ortiz crossed home plate and came out to ask for a review. After a brief chat with home plate umpire Jordan Baker, the crew went to the visitors dugout and returned a short time later to confirm the original ruling. After 44.1 seconds, the play was upheld. "You cant count the big boy out. You cant count this ballclub out," said Red Sox starter Jake Peavy, who did not earn a decision after leaving a 1-1 game in the sevennth inning. Case Keenum Jersey. "Once again, you had the big man up in a big situation and he comes through." Andrew Miller (1-0) earned the victory despite allowing the Rangers to score the go-ahead run in the top of the eighth. Koji Uehara pitched the ninth for his second save. Alexi Ogando (0-1) allowed two runs in the loss. "Ortiz is one of the best and one of the clutchest hitters," Rangers shortstop Elvis Andrus said. The Red Sox scored in the third inning on two walks and a swinging bunt single that was thrown away for an error by pitcher Robbie Ross. The Rangers tied it in the seventh on Mitch Morelands homer and took a 2-1 lead in the eighth when Andrus scored on Alex Rios sacrifice fly. But Ogando walked Jackie Bradley Jr. to lead off the bottom half, and then A.J. Pierzynski blooped a popup down the right-field line that fell in for a single. One out later, Ortiz delivered his 24th career go-ahead homer in the eighth inning or later. "I felt comfortable with Neal up against him," Washington said. "David won." Miller pitched one inning for the win. Ogando struck out four but was charged with two runs on one hit and a walk in his two innings. N